Commute 3/16

Driving to work, I saw the flock of geese flying. They were in front of me, so I could not only see their V formation but their beating wings – pretty much in unison, strongly pushing down and drawing up. No match for the car however and I imagined them beating more strongly and with increasing desperation as I continued to catch up. Inevitably, I caught up with them – neck and neck as it were – and in a pun only I got, I honked my horn as I went under them. I wasn’t after them, after all, and they for their part probably did not consider my beating them to the next exit ramp one in the loss column even if they had seen me pumping my fist in exaltation. If I am allowed one anthropomorphized speculation, I suspect they rolled their eyes at the sound of the horn. “Like we’ve never heard that before” they winked to each other.

My commute was far from over, however. There were thirty more miles to drive, me and the others. Not in a V, but straight lines – parallel lines which with astounding frequency meet and switch and merge and split and remain straight and parallel. I wonder if the geese are astounded to see this. No point man here. No taking the lead so others can rest until it is their turn to come to the front. Whatever lead there is is taken by one who continues to increase his lead until there is no one behind him in sufficient relationship to be considered a follower. Back to the pack, then, and let’s see who breaks from the bunch next.

My expressway commute starts off with two lanes, joins with a three-lane expressway and becomes two or three miles of magnificent four-lane space before one lane exits, then another lane merges in and we are back to two lanes. Then, fifteen miles down the road, a third lane appears on the left and remains there until The City busts up the expressway, parceling its drivers off to their various destinations. The speed limits change but the only times you notice are in the widely-known speed traps. There is one before the joining with the three-lane and one each right before and right after the creation of the third lane. The joining of expressways results in two miles of frantic, strategic jockeying so that one will be in an optimal spot at the end of the process. I’ve made it up to 90 MPH sometimes. You don’t want to be forced down the exit, of course (and why are these ones who want to exit waiting until the last minute to get there? And you, the one coming on, do I have to come to a complete stop for you?), but you also don’t want to be behind that truck in the far right lane either; the one which is in the center lane you can get around before the merge of the third lane, only kicking up a few pebbles from side of the road.

The geese, I had beaten early on in my commute, before the spot about three/quarter-way between where I get on and the joining where the expressway has a traffic light. I can only suppose they did not feel like building a bridge or the wet land around the intersection couldn’t support bridge and the ramps necessary. At that light, all the expressway drivers get to bunch up until green says go. Then the trucks start their long journey through the gears until they reach cruising speed and all the other cars either zip around them, or if they were unfortunate enough to be directly behind them, wait for them to reach a good speed or until the other lane is clear so they can zip around. After the geese, I was in the lane to get around the trucks at the light except there was a car in my lane which as much as it didn’t want to be behind a truck, it also did not want to pass the truck. Cars backed up waiting in vain for their turn to zip around. We got to the joining still crammed together without resolution. The other expressway was fairly clear so several cars burst out from our two lanes over two lanes to that magical fourth space. As it turned out, only one car made it into the fourth lane ahead of me. He was not going that fast but he, like I, just wanted to get around the mess. His license plate made a statement. NO BNDRY it said, which I assumed meant “No Boundary” (What else? “No Bindery”?). I drove somewhat close to him in the fourth lane until he finally felt sufficiently free from the crowd and moved right into what eventually became the left lane. I sped up and passed him and then moved over.

The rest of the commute went fairly smoothly with the expected speed traps at the other two spots on the trip. One I was going a bit fast for but I guess it was my lucky day. I made it to work in plenty of time. I did all my preparations, including making the coffee and got some down time in before the day began.

Posted in Culture/Society, Humor | 1 Comment

Unions

I had an interesting discussion on another board concerning Unions. I tried to piece it together into a cohesive article. I have a couple of observations before getting into it. Continue reading

Posted in Culture/Society, Ethics | 5 Comments

He Left the Linen Cloth And Ran Away Naked – Mark 14:51-52

This is based on an article I read recently called The Naked Runaway and the Enrobed Reporter of Mark 14 and 16, in the Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society (vol 54 no 3 pp 527-545) by Abraham Kuruvilla, an Associate Professor of Pastoral Ministries at Dallas Theological Seminary. What I like about it is Mark 14:51-52 is an obscure passage which I have often scratched my head over, but this article takes the text for what it says, steps back from the speculation and finds meaning and purpose for the story based on literary and exegetical considerations in the text. Continue reading

Posted in Biblical Studies, Mark 14, Mark 16, Theology | 47 Comments

Abraham Married His Sister? Ewww!

The following blog was motivated in part by an exchange I had on an online board. It got me thinking about the Doctrines of Revelation and The Scriptures.

Ewww!

Eww!

These statements got me thinking. I think they are proof of the wisdom of the common Protestant attitude towards Tradition. These statements were made in response to the biblical statement that Abraham’s wife, Sarah, was also his half-sister and were followed by the denial of the statement because Tradition says there is a better – more moral – story. Ultimately, it is the anachronistic imposing of later-century morés into a millennia-old story, as if saying “eww” grants one the authority to change the story. At issue is the concept of Revelation. Continue reading

Posted in Revelation, Scriptures, Theology, Tradition | Leave a comment

Flesh vs Faith: God Tested Abraham

[Abraham] considered that God was able even to raise him from the dead(Hebrews 11:19)

We have come to the BIG event in Abraham’s life. It is the high point to which his life of faith carried him. Of course, it’s not quite as easy as the clichés make it sound. Biblically, this is the big one and through the centuries people heap praise on this event. But practically, the specific example is not one we would support anyone following. Were a Pastor to preach on this incident, and one of his listeners say “I have been greatly inspired by your sermon. This afternoon, Junior and I are going off to worship and later we will return.” The pastor would do everything in his power to dissuade the man. In fact, the intervention would be quite intense and final. If the guy could not be dissuaded, junior would not be allowed to go with him. Continue reading

Posted in Abraham, Biblical Studies, Flesh vs Faith, Genesis 22 | 3 Comments

Flesh vs Faith: Shall Not The Judge Do Right? Genesis 18:16-33

I have been looking at the life of Abraham in a series I titled Flesh Vs Faith. In the NT, Abraham is called the friend of God (James 2:23) and the man of faith (Galatians 3:9) and is presented as our example of faith. Surprisingly, many approach Abraham’s life as an example of what not to do. Continue reading

Posted in Abraham, Flesh vs Faith, Genesis 18 | 1 Comment

Sermon on the Mount: The Obedience of the Righteous Part 2 Matthew 5:27-32

We are in the section of the Sermon which I titled Righteousness Affects Your Obedience. It comes between two statements by Jesus which act together to show the unity of this section. The first is, For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:20) and the second, You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect. (Matthew 5:48) Righteousness – true righteousness – is beyond what the religious leaders of Jesus’ day taught and practiced, it is the very perfection of God. Continue reading

Posted in Biblical Studies, Ethics, Matthew 5-7, The Sermon on the Mount | Leave a comment

Sermon on the Mount: The Obedience of the Righteous Matthew 5:21-26

We are in the section of the Sermon which I titled Righteousness Affects Your Obedience. One reason that I like that title is many think that obedience precedes, or causes, righteousness while the biblical approach has righteousness first and this is the first cause which affects behavior. Continue reading

Posted in Biblical Studies, Ethics, Matthew 5-7, The Image of God, The Sermon on the Mount | 2 Comments

Lest, Perhaps, Paul had Run in Vain

And I went up by revelation; and I laid before them the gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately before them who were of repute, lest by any means I should be running, or had run, in vain. (Galatians 2:2 RV)

I’ve been thinking of this verse in Galatians. Paul is recounting the events of Acts 15 when he and Barnabas went to Jerusalem to confer about the issue of circumcision. Some were teaching that Gentiles must be circumcised – they must become Jews – to be saved. Paul opposed this teaching.

This event comes up frequently in certain circles as the First Church Council and this verse in particular is used to say that Paul had uncertainty concerning what he preached and that he was submitting what he preached to the Church leaders for their affirmation or for their correction. According to this take, Paul was unsure if what he taught was accurate and had the leaders ruled that Gentiles must be circumcised, it is assumed, Paul would have had to admit he had run (taught) in vain and changed his teachings in submission to the leaders. I suggest, rather, that this phrasing means something quite else. Continue reading

Posted in Biblical Studies, Theology | 2 Comments

The Potter and the Clay

The one who stiffens his neck after numerous rebukes will suddenly be destroyed without remedy. (Proverbs 29:1)

This proverb came to my thinking recently, maybe in the context of me not “stiffening my neck” so much, but I don’t know. The image is of a person insisting on going his way despite repeated evidence and corrections to turn back. The result is utter failure and destruction. Whatever he had hoped would protect him on his journey of folly will not work. Without remedy. Continue reading

Posted in Biblical Studies, Ethics, Flesh vs Faith, Jeremiah 18, Proverbs 29:1 | 5 Comments